BenchmarksPerplexityToday
Sonar Pro Benchmark Update
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
View sourcePerplexity
Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See details here For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, the Sonar Pro API can handle in-depth, multi-step queries with added extensibility, like...
---
Quality Score
---
Arena ELO
Undisclosed
Parameters
200K
Context
Sign in to join the discussion
0
Downloads
0
Likes
Mar 2025
Released
Benchmarks
20
Research
10
Recent launch, pricing, benchmark, and API signals linked to this model or its provider.
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
View sourcelanguage: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
View sourceQuality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
View sourcelanguage: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
View sourceQuality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
View sourceQuality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.1/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Quality: 9.3/100 | Price: $0/M tokens | Output: 0 tok/s | MMLU: 0.755% | HumanEval: 0.275%
Discrete diffusion models for categorical generation are defined by a corruption kernel, which determines the intermediate state space and the associated reverse prediction problem. We study uniform discrete diffusion and ask whether its training objective and reverse transitions can be enriched without changing the underlying categorical corruption process. We introduce Simplax, an exact Dirichlet--categorical augmentation that couples each corrupted categorical state with an auxiliary simplex-valued variable while preserving the original uniform diffusion process as its categorical marginal. This augmentation yields a tractable Rao--Blackwellized reverse-bridge objective and a corresponding stochastic reverse sampler, while retaining the corrupted categorical state as the denoiser input. Empirically, Simplax improves the generative perplexity--entropy tradeoff on unconditional OpenWebText generation. On Sudoku, a model trained exclusively on 30-clue puzzles achieves the highest accuracy among the compared methods across all evaluated clue densities, including the minimum uniquely solvable 17-clue regime, and also achieves the highest validity in unconditional generation.
Positional embeddings (PE) in Transformers encode token distance and order but are largely agnostic to syntactic structure. We introduce Syntax-informed Positional Embeddings (SiPE), which learns a lightweight syntactic prior from dependency parses during pretraining and injects it across all three dominant PE families (absolute, relative, rotary), for both encoders and decoders, leaving self-attention and the rest of the architecture untouched. We isolate where and how the prior should enter the model, and find it depends on the architecture: for autoregressive decoders that use relative PE, the prior is strongest when coupled multiplicatively with the relative-position term of the attention score, outperforming injection into the input embeddings, into self-attention, or into the positional and attention terms jointly---while for encoders it is best added directly to the input embeddings, composing with each encoder's native positional mechanism. We find that models pre-trained with SiPE improve on the SyntaxGym benchmark by up to 10.3% while simultaneously reducing perplexity by 9.0% over a base model with no syntactic supervision---a metric nearly every existing syntax-injection method instead degrades. Crucially, these gains extend beyond syntactic generalization: SiPE also improves real-world language understanding, raising scores on the GLUE benchmark by up to 8.2% over a model trained without it. Unlike existing syntactic language models that marginalize over many parses at inference or discard syntax at runtime, SiPE conditions on a single parse, establishing a new Pareto frontier between syntactic supervision and inference cost.
Optimizer state is the largest single line item in the memory budget of mixture-of-experts (MoE) training: on a 6.78B-parameter MoE language model, AdamW keeps 50.6 GB of first and second moments to update 12.6 GB of bfloat16 weights. We study SkewAdam, an optimizer built on the observation that the three parameter populations of an MoE - the dense backbone, the experts, and the router - differ enough in size and gradient statistics that they should not receive the same state. SkewAdam keeps float32 momentum plus a factored second moment for the backbone (5% of parameters), a factored second moment alone for the experts (95%), and an exact second moment for the router (<0.01%). The resulting state occupies 1.29 GB, 2.6% of AdamW's, and peak training memory falls from 81.4 GB to 31.3 GB, within the budget of a 40 GB accelerator. In a controlled comparison from identical initializations over 82M tokens, SkewAdam reaches validation perplexity 108.4, ahead of AdamW (126.8), Muon (120.2), and Lion (393.7), and settles router load balance to within 1% of its uniform floor. The allocation is not what earns that perplexity: a tier ablation matches it with twenty times the state, and Adafactor, which shares the factored estimator but drops momentum, plateaus 40 points behind. The tiers buy memory at no cost to accuracy; the accuracy comes from keeping momentum, which a uniform optimizer shares too. Sweeping the baselines' learning rates narrows but does not close the gap: the best tuned AdamW reaches 118.5, tuned Adafactor 139.7. Where optimizer state lives, these results suggest, matters at least as much as how much of it there is.
Structured pruning is a hardware-friendly way to compress LLMs, but it is mostly validated on multiple-choice recognition tasks, while the same compressed checkpoints can collapse on the free-form generation that deployment actually requires. Two observations trace this gap. First, greedy pass@1 nearly vanishes after compression, yet pass@k recovers substantially under repeated sampling: useful generations are demoted, not erased. Second, the recoverable regime fails mainly through suffix repetition. Recovery should therefore train on the compressed model's own on-policy states with dense token-level supervision, which On-Policy Distillation (OPD) provides by reusing the pre-compression model as a frozen teacher. However, long on-policy rollouts spend early recovery budget on low-information repetitive suffixes, delaying loss descent. To mitigate this waste, we propose \shortopd, a short-to-long OPD schedule that detects teacher-confirmed repetitive suffixes, treats the surviving prefix as each rollout's effective length, and allocates future rollout budgets to the effective lengths the policy can currently use. Across math, code, and open-ended generation, \shortopd\ raises the compressed model's score to about 9times its unrecovered value and 1.6--4.4times standard recovery recipes (SFT w/o KD, KD, and SeqKD), and it matches a fixed 8192-token rollout horizon within two points using a quarter of the training time (8.5 vs.\ 35.9 hours) and 71% fewer rollout tokens. We hope this recipe helps move structured pruning beyond marginal gains on perplexity and multiple-choice benchmarks, a step closer to deployment-ready generation quality.
Modern language models, including transformer, recurrent, and memory-based variants, share a common chassis: a stack of identical layers in which parameters are allocated uniformly across depth. This is a default inherited from the original transformer and largely unchanged since, yet a growing body of evidence suggests that layers contribute non-uniformly to the final output, with later layers refining the residual stream rather than transforming it. We ask whether parameter capacity should reflect this asymmetry. Our controlled experiment shows that, under a fixed budget, allocating more capacity to earlier layers and less to later layers improves perplexity over a uniform-width baseline, while the reverse allocation hurts. Building on this result, we introduce Tapered Language Models (TLMs), an architectural principle in which a parameter-bearing component is monotonically tapered across depth under a fixed total budget. MLPs are the natural site for this instantiation: they dominate parameter count across all modern LM families and expose width as a single, clean axis of variation. Across three model scales and four architectures (Transformer, Gated Attention, Hope-attention, and Titans), tapering MLP width via a smooth cosine schedule consistently improves perplexity and downstream benchmark performance over uniform baselines, at no additional parameter or compute cost. These findings establish depth-aware capacity allocation as a simple, architecture-agnostic axis of language model design, a free lever hidden in plain sight.
Optimizing pretraining data composition is pivotal for LLM generalization. While dynamic mixing outperforms static strategies by capturing evolving training dynamics, current methods fail to reconcile computational efficiency with sample efficiency and structural flexibility for diverse pipelines.We introduce Actor--Critic Online Data Mixing (AC-ODM), which approaches data mixing from a reinforcement learning perspective with a parameterized policy that we theoretically prove to act as a dynamic linear surrogate maximizing the constructive interference of gradients. To enhance practical flexibility, AC-ODM supports two operational modes: (i) a proxy mode for fixed, pre-prepared corpora, where a policy learned on a small model is transferred to a larger target; and (ii) a non-proxy mode for direct end-to-end training from scratch without priors. Empirically, AC-ODM significantly outperforms prior methods in convergence speed and downstream accuracy across various architectures. On Pythia-1B, it reaches optimal validation perplexity using up to 66% fewer training steps than competitive baselines, delivering a 27.5% relative improvement in MMLU accuracy and a 2.23 x higher pass@1 on HumanEval, all while incurring a virtually negligible (0.4%) per-step wall-clock increase and only 2% additional memory overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/DANG-ai/AC-ODM.
Scaling laws have made language-model performance predictable from model size, data, and compute, but they typically treat the optimizer as a fixed training detail. We show that this assumption misses a fundamental axis of representation scaling: how effectively the optimizer converts added FFN width into utilized spectral capacity. Using eigenspectra of feed-forward network representations, measured through soft and hard spectral-ranks, we find that the same Transformer architecture realizes markedly different spectral scaling laws when trained with different optimizers. Holding architecture and width schedule fixed, AdamW exhibits weak hard-rank scaling (β=0.44) on rare-token (TAIL) representations where learning is known to be hardest, whereas Muon achieves linear scaling (β=1.02) in the same regimes, a 2.3times increase in the scaling exponent. This difference is not reducible to validation loss: AdamW configurations can match low-rank Dion variants in perplexity, under extended training, while exhibiting sharply different spectral geometry, demonstrating that matched loss does not imply matched representation structure. Hard--soft rank asymmetry further reveals that optimizers differ not only in how much capacity is realized, but also in how that capacity is structured across eigenmodes. To disentangle optimizer effects from architectural ones, we compare against architectural interventions (e.g., attention rank and positional encoding), and find that optimizer-induced spectral shifts often exceed the architectural effects. These results suggest optimization as a first-class axis of representation scaling, motivating optimizer--architecture co-design.
Autoregressive language models execute Transformer layers sequentially, creating a latency bottleneck that is not removed by conventional tensor or pipeline parallelism. We study whether this layerwise dependency can be relaxed by treating the hidden-state trace across layers as the solution of a nonlinear residual equation and solving it with parallel Newton-style updates. While this view is principled, exact Newton corrections require expensive Jacobian-vector products and naive fixed-point iterations are unstable on trained Transformers. We introduce Structured Newton Layer Parallelism (SNLP), a training and inference framework that replaces exact layer Jacobians with cheap architecture-induced surrogate dynamics. In residual Transformers, this yields Identity Newton (IDN), where the correction reduces to a prefix-sum-like update; in mHC-style architectures, HC Newton (HCN) uses the model's residual mixing matrix. We further introduce SNLP-aware regularization, which trains models to make one or a few structured Newton iterations accurately approximate the sequential forward. Experiments on nanochat-scale Transformers show that SNLP regularization improves layer-parallel compatibility and can also improve standard sequential perplexity, reducing baseline PPL by 4.7%-23.4%. At inference time, SNLP combined with layer fusion and chunkwise decomposition achieves practical wall-clock speedups: on a 0.5B Nanochat model, it reaches 2.3x speedup while still improving PPL by 6.1%. These results suggest that layer-parallel inference is not merely a numerical approximation to sequential execution, but can act as a useful solver-induced inference bias. We also characterize limitations: off-the-shelf pretrained models are less amenable to this procedure, and exact convergence recovers the sequential computation rather than providing monotonic inference-time scaling.
Recent progress in reasoning models has substantially advanced long-horizon mathematical and scientific problem solving, with several systems now reaching gold-medal-level performance on International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and International Physics Olympiad (IPhO) problems. In this paper, we introduce a simple and unified recipe for converting a post-trained reasoning backbone into a rigorous olympiad-level solver. The recipe first uses a reverse-perplexity curriculum for SFT to instill rigorous proof-search and self-checking behaviors, then scales these behaviors through a two-stage RL pipeline that progresses from RL with verifiable rewards to more delicate proof-level RL, and finally boosts solving performance with test-time scaling. Applying this recipe, we train a 30B-A3B backbone with SFT on around 340K sub-8K-token trajectories followed by 200 RL steps. The resulting model, SU-01, supports stable reasoning on difficult problems with trajectories exceeding 100K tokens, while achieving gold-medal-level performance on mathematical and physical olympiad competitions, including IMO 2025/USAMO 2026 and IPhO 2024/2025. It also demonstrates strong generalization of scientific reasoning to domains beyond mathematics and physics.
Attention Residuals replace standard additive residual connections with learned softmax attention over previous layer outputs, enabling selective cross-layer routing. However, standard Attention Residuals still attend over cumulative hidden states in previous layers, which are highly redundant. We show that this redundancy leads to routing collapse in deeper layers: attention weights become low-contrast and closer to uniform (max weight {approx}0.2), limiting the model's ability to select informative states in previous layers. This raises a key but underexplored design question: what layer-wise representations should be routed in Attention Residuals? To answer this question, we propose Delta Attention Residuals, which attend over deltas -- the change introduced by each sublayer (v_i = h_{i+1} - h_i) -- instead of cumulative states. Delta representations are structurally diverse and yield higher-contrast attention distributions (max weight {approx}0.6), enabling more selective and effective routing across layers. This principle applies at both per-sublayer and block granularity. Across all tested scales (220M--7.6B), Delta Attention Residuals consistently outperform both standard residuals and Attention Residuals, with 1.7--8.2\% validation perplexity gains. Delta Attention Residuals also enables converting pretrained checkpoints into Delta Attention Residuals via standard fine-tuning. Code is available at https://github.com/wdlctc/delta-attention-residuals-code.
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9
language: 0.8 | coding: 1.0 | instruction_following: 1.0 | Overall: 0.9