Qwen1.5-4B-Chat

Name: Qwen1.5-4B-Chat
Rating: 27.6 (53 reviews)
Author: Qwen

#4819Large Language ModelsProprietary

Qwen

8 model sizes, including 0.5B, 1.8B, 4B, 7B, 14B, 32B and 72B dense models, and an MoE model of 14B with 2.7B activated; Significant performance improvement in human preference for chat models; Multilingual support of both base and chat models; Stable support of 32K context length for models of all sizes No need of...

Model updates refreshed4h agoNov 6, 2026news + changelog

Website View Updates

Rates & subscription access

View full pricing details

Tracked access rates

Live access is not confirmed for this model. No current purchase price is advertised.

Related provider subscriptions

No current subscription pricing is tracked for this model.

Confirm this specific model, usage limits, and billing terms with the provider. A subscription does not automatically include API credits.

No login needed to compare. Prices are in USD; provider charges are separate from AI Market Cap plans. Context length, caching, tools, taxes, and regional terms can change the final cost. Open weights do not mean free hosting.

27.6

Quality Score

1003

Arena ELO

Parameters

33K

Context

Evidence profile

How complete is this record?

This measures the amount of verifiable public evidence we have, not how capable the model is. A missing field means it has not been verified yet, not that its value is zero.

77%

coverage

Strong evidence

17 of 22 public signals

Technical profile100%

Benchmarks and Competitive Signal

Structured

Use this section to answer one simple question first: how much outside evidence do we have that this model performs well? Structured benchmark scores appear first, then official provider evidence, then live arena signal.

This model has normalized benchmark rows, so scores here are directly comparable across benchmark sources.

LiveBench Languagelanguage

0.0

LiveBench Coding

Similar Models

Discussion (0)

Loading comments...

Official Benchmark Evidence

These are recent benchmark or leaderboard claims from official provider sources. They are useful for freshness and context, but they are not treated the same as normalized independent benchmark rows.