Anthropic
Previous generally available Opus release retained for compatibility after the Claude Opus 4.8 launch. Still strong for advanced software engineering, long-running task reliability, self-verification, and high-resolution vision, but superseded by Opus 4.8 for Anthropic's latest Opus-tier performance.
Still strong for advanced software engineering, long-running task reliability, self-verification, and high-resolution vision, but superseded by Opus 4.8 for Anthropic's latest Opus-tier performance.
48.7
Quality Score
1298
Arena ELO
Undisclosed
Parameters
1M
Context
Use this section to answer one simple question first: how much outside evidence do we have that this model performs well? Structured benchmark scores appear first, then official provider evidence, then live arena signal.
This model has normalized benchmark rows, so scores here are directly comparable across benchmark sources.
Sign in to join the discussion
0
Downloads
0
Likes
Apr 2026
Released
These are recent benchmark or leaderboard claims from official provider sources. They are useful for freshness and context, but they are not treated the same as normalized independent benchmark rows.
Claude-Opus-4 - LiveCodeBench
LiveCodeBench pass@1 62.4 across 1055 tasks
View sourceClaude-Opus-4 - LiveCodeBench
LiveCodeBench pass@1 62.4 across 1055 tasks
View sourceIntroducing Claude Opus 4.7
Users report being able to hand off their hardest coding work—the kind that previously needed close supervision—to Opus 4.7 with confidence. And—although it is less broadly capable than our most powerful model, Claude Mythos Preview—it shows better results than Opus 4.6 across a range of benchmarks: Last week we announced Project Glasswing , highlighting the risks—and benefits—of AI models for cybersecurity. Clarence Huang VP of Technology Anthropic has already set the standa
View source1298
ELO Score
1291 - 1305
95% Confidence
+/-7 points
20.0K
Battles
Jul 28, 2026
Last Updated